Aller au contenu

TTS API comparison 2026

Gradium TTS vs Murf Speech Gen 2 Gradium vs Murf AI · text-to-speech for voice agents

Gradium TTS is in the Headroom speed tier (P95 at or under 101 ms); Murf Speech Gen 2 is in the no speed tier (not measured by Coval). Below, each measure side by side with its source; a model leads on a measure only beyond the tie rule. No combined score, no overall winner.

Data read October 22, 2026 · Coval, Speko, Artificial Analysis

Side by side

Measure Gradium TTS Murf Speech Gen 2
Speed tierCoval P95, 30 days Headroomnot measured
Median time to first audioCoval, 30-day window 55 ms —
P95 time to first audio (slow turns)Coval, 30-day window 101 ms —
Time to first audio, board chartSpeko, US East 55 ms —
Naturalness EloSpeko 1,592 not rated
Listener Elo (95% interval)Artificial Analysis 1,176 ±13 986 ±12
Numbers and dates (0 to 1)Speko 0.27 not rated
List price per 1M charactersCoval, Speko, Artificial Analysis $35.9 to $57.8 $100

In bold: the model ahead on that measure. “tie”: latencies within 10 ms, or Elo scores whose 95% intervals overlap.

Where Gradium TTS is ahead

  • →Listener Elo (95% interval): 1,176 ±13 vs 986 ±12 (Artificial Analysis)
  • →List price per 1M characters: $35.9 to $57.8 vs $100 (Coval, Speko, Artificial Analysis)
Gradium TTS: all measurements →

Where Murf Speech Gen 2 is ahead

On the published measures, Murf Speech Gen 2 is ahead of Gradium TTS on none beyond the tie rule. This says nothing about features the benchmarks do not measure.

Murf Speech Gen 2: all measurements →

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Gradium TTS and Murf Speech Gen 2?
Gradium TTS (Gradium) is in the Headroom speed tier (P95 at or under 101 ms); Murf Speech Gen 2 (Murf AI) is in the no speed tier (not measured by Coval). Gradium TTS leads on listener Elo (95% interval) and list price per 1M characters; Murf Speech Gen 2 leads on no measure. No combined score is computed.
Which is faster for real-time voice agents, Gradium TTS or Murf Speech Gen 2?
Only Gradium TTS is measured by Coval (median 55 ms, P95 101 ms); Murf Speech Gen 2 has no speed tier, so the two cannot be compared on the same window.
Which sounds more natural, Gradium TTS or Murf Speech Gen 2?
Speko naturalness: 1,592 for Gradium TTS, not rated for Murf Speech Gen 2. Artificial Analysis listener Elo: 1,176 ±13 and 986 ±12. The two sources use different listeners and can disagree.
How are these two text-to-speech APIs compared?
Speed first, on Coval's median and P95 time to first audio; then voice quality (Speko, Artificial Analysis), accuracy on numbers and dates (Speko) and list price. Latencies within 10 ms and Elo scores whose intervals overlap are ties. Scores from different benchmarks are never added into one number.
Can these numbers be checked?
Yes. Each model page lists every measurement with its source and the date of the reading, and links to the benchmark page it comes from. The rules are on the methodology page.

More comparisons

Compare two other TTS APIs →